Categories
Opinions

Furthering the Degeneration of Haiti

In 2010, the country of Haiti experienced a magnitude seven earthquake which displaced thousands of people and left hundreds dead. This earthquake left the country in physical shambles. Many of the people living in Haiti became infected with cholera in addition to being left hungry and homeless. The world’s response was immediate: Billions of dollars were spent on bringing foreign aid to the people of Haiti to provide clean drinking water, shelter, medical supplies, food, and other necessities. The hope was that eventually aid could relieve some of the strife that occurred due to the earthquake. Sadly this aid only created dependency. The attempt to produce long and short-term aid projects ended up creating a long-term relationship with aid.

Photo by: Nate Moore
Photo by: Nate Moore

Now, just a couple weeks ago Hurricane Matthew hit the Island of Haiti. While the hurricane was only a category four, it had far greater impact on a country that was already struggling. This scenario looks all too familiar for the people of Haiti, as they have been further displaced, harmed, and now are trying to rebuild the lives they have been working on repairing for the past six years. The information coming out of Haiti reports 900 deaths and climbing. Again, the country of Haiti experienced a tremendous amount of infrastructure damage, displacement of people, and a further dependency on aid. The people located in the more rural areas are once again dealing with a cholera outbreak due to the lack of clean water; it is the disaster of 2010 all over again.

The real question now is what do we do, or perhaps even if we should bother helping. According to the BBC News, “The UN launched an emergency appeal for nearly $120m in aid, but just a fraction of it has been raised…” Countries are tired of sending money to a country that seems lost and hopeless. Many of us have probably seen the articles about The American Red Cross not actually producing results from the aid in 2010. One Huffington Post article said the organization had only built six permanent homes in Haiti, claiming 91 percent of donations went straight to charity, when in actuality only 60 percent had gone to charity. Even an organization many know, seemly cannot be trusted. So where should we be putting our money, and is it even worth it?

sarahquoteIn 2010, we ultimately failed Haiti, let us not do it again. Organizations were quick to respond to the destruction caused by the earthquake and in the wake of Hurricane Matthew, but that is not the way to create a sustainable way of living. Yes, we need address immediate needs by supplying clean water, shelter, and food, but we need to have a plan that goes beyond our initial reactions. The country of Haiti is no stranger to a corrupt government, lack of infrastructure, natural disasters, and resource exploitation. It makes sense that the country’s response to foreign involvement tends to be more skeptical and hesitant to allow Non-Governmental Organizations and governments to help. However, when we do so, we need to remember to involve the people themselves. Teams often come in with their own idea of what needs to be done without understanding the needs of the people. We come in with our checklists and our money, not understanding what the deeper issues are.

Haiti is a country trapped in poverty, corruption and vulnerability, but that does not mean the country is without hope. By empowering the people of Haiti, we build a stronger force of those who believe in the efforts taking place to create a sustainable way of living. Aid must turn into development otherwise it perpetuates the dependency we see. Too often we read articles about people being frustrated with foreign involvement and seeing nothing happen within their country. What we need to see is foreign investors providing work for the people, giving them a sense of ownership and responsibility for what happens in their country. Haiti is not hopeless. The people just need to know they are capable.

Sarah is a senior majoring in international development and political science with a minor in Spanish.

Categories
Opinions

A Tale of Two Zip Codes

Tonight, along Houghton’s Genesee river banks, I cast my fishing line and hear the ghost of Charles Dickens howling – “It was the best of times, it was the worst of times.”  Downstream there was a sense of the best of times. The affluent citizens of the Pittsford area kept warm in their gas-fueled homes after tending to their white-collared professional careers and driving their new BMWs through the streets of one of the most successful elite super zip towns of America.   Upstream the working class folks of Belfast were heated by the glow of a wood stove, modestly getting by driving in a late model Chevy pickup coming from their blue-collared job in one of the poorest counties in the state.  

JosephGilligan_RGBMy fictional scenario dramatizes the national economic debate called income inequality. Yet, as a whole, the two Genesee Valley towns offer a glimpse into the true root of the cause of income inequality between the new elite class and the lower middle class.  While many carelessly characterize Pittsford as greedy, selfish, and very secular, the irony is most affluent towns are following traditional American values more so than their working class counterparts.   While we have always had rich people in the US, it appears that cultural norms that once glued us together have created a chasm between the classes. In the 1950s, there weren’t super rich towns. The rich and poor lived together, worshipped together, and sent their children to the same school. Today, the rich live in super zips, also known as the zip codes with the highest per capita income and college graduations in the country; yet, the glue (i.e. education, marriage, religiosity, and community involvement) holding income classes together is coming apart.  

We know a college degree creates higher earning potential.  In Pittsford, over 70% of the population has a college degree, with a median household income north of $130,000.  In Belfast, just 12% of its citizens have a college degree and have a household median income of $40,000.  Colleges provide proficiency in a specific majors and create networking opportunities with fellow students and alumni alike to secure future jobs. Local companies recruit students who will transition quickly at their firm.  In the Genesee Valley, engineering firms recruit from Rochester Institute of Technology, hospitals will recruit nurses from St. John Fisher College and NGOs recruit at Houghton.    

Marriage is the cornerstone of our culture and creates stronger economic and social power for children.  Single family homes accounts for a third of the reason why income inequality has grown since 1979.  In Belfast, the divorce rate is nearly twice that of Pittsford.  We  have recently seen the rise of assortative mating by couples subconsciously using college degrees to screen marriage prospects such as many Ivy league alums marry other Ivy league alums.  Such clustering of educated married couples into Pittsford creates a brain drain from lower middle class towns. 

Community volunteerism helps develop what social scientist Robert Putnam calls “social capital”.  A community with high social capital is more likely to have members that volunteer in their youth sports leagues and their fire departments.  It will also be place where neighbors help a family that loses their house to a fire or an unemployed father trying to find a job.  These communities tend to have lower crime rates, better health, great public schools, and better economic growth rates.  Pittsford boosts one of the top high schools in the nation and list over 30 community events including parades, festivals, concerts, dances, and outdoor movies.  Belfast only lists five. 

Finally, there is religion.  Church organizations create nearly half of the charity and half of the volunteerism in this country.  According to psychology professor David Myers of Hope College, people that are religious tend to create a happy community and a happy community tends to be contagious.  Living in Pittsford you are 65% percent more likely to belong and attend a church than Belfast.   

In the 1960s President Johnson declared a war on poverty. More than fifty years and 22 trillion dollars later, we have not changed the poverty rate. The war was lost because many of the programs crushed our traditional values and failed to calculate human nature. Today’s war on inequality will double down on these misguided policies and expect a different result. My contention with Pittsford and the super zips isn’t their success or affluence; rather, “they don’t preach what they practice” notes Charles Murray, a social scientist 

Let us pass policy to increase equitable education through tax vouchers for private and charter schools, strengthen marriage by eliminating the marriage tax penalty, and restore good paying blue collar jobs by eliminating unnecessary regulation on construction, fracking, lumber mills, fishers, farmers and coal miners.
As I throw my fishing line into the Genesee River for the last time tonight, I think of the preaching of Jesus who said, “Follow Me, and I will make you fishers of men.”

Categories
News

Houghton Students Attend Calvin Conference

Fifteen Houghton students and two professors attended the eighth-annual Faith and International Development Conference at Calvin College in Grand Rapids, Michigan, last weekend.
The conference, subtitled “From Here to Shalom: Participating in God’s Plan for Universal Flourishing,” was intended to inform students of current development issues around the world, and to supply them with new perspectives on how to address them. For conference attendees it was also an opportunity to interact with potential employers.

Courtesy of Derek Schwabe
Courtesy of Derek Schwabe

“It was a great chance to network with NGOs (Non-Governmental Organizations), some that I would possibly like to work with in the future,” said Moeun Sun, sophomore.
Approximately three hundred and thirty students from thirty colleges and universities attended the conference. It was organized by Calvin students with the assistance of their International Development Studies faculty, and featured representatives from twenty-five different NGOs. It lasted four days, during which attendees were able to enjoy the full extent of Calvin’s snow-covered campus and ventured into Grand Rapids.

The conference was constructed around a number of general plenaries for all to attend, which were interspersed with smaller sessions, in which representatives of various NGOs gave presentations on the nature and goals of their organizations. These presentations ranged the full spectrum of developmental issues, including peacemaking, healthcare, advocacy, and the environment.

Sun said, “I was pleasantly surprised at how many different kinds of FBOs (Faith-Based Organizations) were represented there.” The individual NGOs held smaller sessions to discuss general ideas or issues and the means by which the NGO seeks to address them.

Senior Andrea Pacheco said, “As someone who has attended the conference for two years now, I found it to be very instrumental in learning about the field of international development, and what it involves.” “This year there were key speakers, such as Steve Radelet, that I think added much more academic and professional credibility to the conference,” Pacheco continued, pointing out that many of the NGOs present have high-minded goals while not necessarily having the necessary expertise.

The conference was not simply a collaboration of NGOs from different fields, but also from multiple denominations. Among the speakers and leaders were Mennonite, Reformed, and Episcopalian Christians. Readers who know Church history might appreciate the ecumenical development exemplified at the conference.

While the conference was overall a success, the information which was presented tended to be fairly basic. There is an inherent difficulty in organizing such a conference, as the attendees all come from different backgrounds. While some might find the information to be basic, it might be entirely novel to others, who are more recent to the topic. This diversity shows up even among the Houghton students who went.

Freshman Matthew Munkittrick said, “I went because I am studying International Development and wanted to get to know a bit more about what I am going to be studying.”

Additionally, the speakers generally focused on their own experiences and contextual situations. Pacheco says, “I’d like to see some more presentations on concrete, current research of the field.” The attendance of Dr. Radelet was a step in that direction, but the vast majority of the speakers were still anecdotal.

Despite the criticisms some of the Houghton students had, they all enjoyed the conference, and everyone got more from it than they had anticipated. In the words of Munkittrick, “Overall, it was definitely worth the twelve-hour bus ride!”