Categories
National News

National // Jill Stein Files For Election Recount

Jill Stein, candidate for the Green Party’s failed bid for the White House, has filed for a recount in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania. According to the Associated Press (AP), Stein raised $7 million toward the effort, twice what she garnered for her campaign.

The AP reported that Stein alleged possible tampering with electronic voting machines in the three states. This claim which was backed by J Alex Halderman, a computer science professor at the University of Michigan, according to BBC.

The White House refuted any possibility of tampering with the election results. A senior official in the Obama administration stated to Politico, We stand behind our election results, which accurately reflect the will of the American people.” The Clinton campaign also acknowledged a lack of evidence to support Stein’s allegations. Marc Elias, general counsel of Hillary Clinton’s campaign, said he found no  “actionable evidence of hacking or outside attempts to alter the voting technology,” Politico reported. Nonetheless, observers from the Clinton campaign will be present at recounts in Michigan, according to BBC.

President-elect Donald Trump  countered the recount filings with allegations of his own via Twitter. “In addition to winning the Electoral College in a landslide, I won the popular vote if you deduct the millions who voted illegally,” he tweeted on Monday. Also on Monday, Trump clarified in another tweet that he was referring to “serious voter fraud” in Virginia, California, and New Hampshire. NBC News reported that no evidence has been found to support Trump’s claim.

California Secretary of State, Alex Padilla, responded with a tweet of his own, saying, “It appears that Mr. Trump is troubled by the fact that a growing majority of Americans did not vote for him. His unsubstantiated claims of voter fraud in California and elsewhere are absurd. His reckless tweets are inappropriate and unbecoming of a President-elect,” NBC News reported. Clinton won the popular vote by about 2 million votes, according to NBC News.

Also on Monday, Stein filed a suit against the Wisconsin Elections Committee. The Committee refused to require each county to conduct a recount; if Stein’s loses her suit, she will have to petition each of Wisconsin’s 80+ counties to recount votes.

A Pennsylvania recount will require Stein to provide evidence of probable vote manipulation, which the Pennsylvania Secretary of State Pedro Cortes says there is “absolutely no evidence” of, according to the Philadelphia Media Network.

The AP reported that while it is highly unlikely a recount will change the election outcome, the drive for funds will continue to push Stein onto the national stage. After the recount matter is settled, any leftover funds will be funneled into the Green Party for “election integrity efforts and to promote voting system reform,” Stein said. Stein also wrote on her website, “These recounts are part of an election integrity movement to attempt to shine a light on just how untrustworthy the US election system is.”

Trump denounced the recount efforts as a “scam,” and accused the Green Party of attempting to “fill up their coffers,” according to BBC. BBC also reported that Trump accused Clinton of reneging on her concession to Trump late on November 8.

Categories
Opinions

You Voted For Trump: Now What?

On November 9th I woke up to find out that Donald Trump was president. I wept. I did not cry because “my candidate” did not win. I cried because Trump received 85% of the evangelical vote despite his numerous offensive comments towards women, Mexicans, immigrants, Muslims, and the disabled. This statistic became more painful when I realized that 81% of these evangelicals were white. Since I go to school with predominantly white evangelicals, some of whom have likely voted for Trump, I have chosen to address the rest of this OpED to this demographic.

Photo by: Anthony Burdo
Photo by: Anthony Burdo

Now, I know that not everyone who voted for Trump did so for racist or misogynist intents. I get that, and I would not want to accuse you of such things. But, if you are an individual who voted for Trump, particularly if you are of Caucasian descent, I need you to hear me. I know, that most of you did not approve of either candidate and that you probably felt that Trump was the lesser of two evils. You may have had other rational decisions motivating your vote. Yet, the bitter truth remains that 85% of Evangelical Christians did not see racism as a deal breaker.

We can debate about what it means to be an “evangelical” or we can debate whether or not Trump will abandon his offensive persona in office. We can even argue over the legitimacy of one voting for Trump over Clinton, but that is not the point of this piece. I am writing today to tell my white brothers and sisters that the results of this election have wounded my trust in the Church. I know this was not your intention. However, I feel uneasy knowing that majority of the American Church did not think about how their vote would directly affect the individuals who Trump had slandered. Christians cannot vote that way, particularly in this type of election. The Christian Church has a duty to its stranger (the refugee), to its vulnerable (the immigrant, the disabled), to the misrepresented (women and Muslim citizens), and to ethnic members of the Church. The fact that majority of evangelicals voted for Trump in light of these issues makes it difficult for me to believe that racism was considered a real problem in the campaign. Indeed, for 81% of these Evangelicals, racism was not and will not be a personal issue; perhaps that is why it was not a problem.

jiwanquoteI know this is a hard thing for me to say. I know it is even harder to hear, but I need you to know how your actions have hurt minorities, whether you intended it or not. It is hard to believe there is a place in America and the American Church for me, or people like me, because too many people voted without holding Trump accountable for his abusive language and campaign. If you voted for Trump, I do love you. That is why I wrote this article; the Church cannot be the Church if it remains passive in the face of injustice, and so I ask you to act. It is likely that racial prejudice and its dynamics are new to you, therefore, listen to your non-white friends and see what they have to say about it. Be honest about Trump’s (and other individual’s) abuses and please and avoid trivializing their pain. Rather, stand beside minorities and women who have been slandered in this campaign and hold the new president to a higher standard. You may have voted for Trump, but please make efforts to affirm that the Hispanic community, newly settled refugees, Muslim citizens and immigrants are valued people under Trump’s administration.  

I have heard many people comment that we ought not to worry about Trump’s presidency because God is in control. This is true, but the statement is being used as a horribly passive approach to the issues at hand. We are the Church and in this turbulent time we do not get to hide behind sentimental ideas of providence, but we must repent to one another. For when the Church acts like the Church and works for peace, only then shall we see the reconciling spirit of God at work.

Jiwan is a senior majoring in philosophy and theology.

Categories
Opinions

Election 2016: A Babylonian Furnace

Flannery O’Connor (1925-1962) was a preeminent writer in the American South. O’Connor drew her stories from her rural Georgian experiences and her Roman Catholic faith.  She wrote about morality and ethics in the post antebellum South.  O’Connor’s Southern Gothic writing style involves deeply flawed characters engaged in sinister plots. In O’Connor’s A Good Man is Hard to Find comprised of a collection of short stories, she writes an interesting short story titled A Circle In The Fire. The story parallels the Book of Daniel and interestingly parallels the 2016 Presidential Election.

Photo by: Anthony Burdo
Photo by: Anthony Burdo

By replacing the characters in A Circle In the Fire with the cast of the 2016 election candidates and pundits, we find O’Connor’s short story traces this election’s story.  Focusing on the protagonist Mrs. Cope (played by Mrs. Clinton) and her plantation (the Democrat Blue Wall),  O’Connor paints Mrs. Cope as a paranoid and secretive woman scared of losing control of her farm (her power) and is obsessed in guarding her privacy (her home email server).  She believes she has complete control of her plantation and the people working on it.  Like the Babylonian King Nebuchadnezzar, Mrs. Cope demands her subordinates to idolize and worship her. Her friend and assistant, Mrs. Pinchard (played by Huma Abedin) does her best to make Mrs. Cope comfortable and shield her from the real world. While working with Mrs. Cope each day on the farm, Mrs. Pinchard shares tragic stories (of regular Americans). Mrs. Cope is interested in these misfortunes because they have not befallen her or her farm. She has servants (played by Bernie Sanders and a few Millennials) that are picked on by Mrs. Cope for doing their work wrong because they are lazy and stupid.   

joegquoteOne day, three teenage boys show up on the farm and trespass onto the plantation. The boys names are Garfield Smith (played by Newt Gingrich), W.T. Harper (played by Rudy Guiliani), and their leader Powel Boyd (played by Donald Trump). Powel is wild and an unpredictable outsider who uses foul language, smokes cigarettes, and has little respect for the elite plantation structure. Powel is on the farm to rekindle something lost from his idyllic childhood (Making America Great Again). Mrs. Cope doesn’t want this basket full of deplorables on her farm, but she allows them to stay even when they prove too much for her to control. She offers them sandwiches and drinks, but similar to the Book of  Daniel 1:11-13, the boys refuse it because Mrs. Cope wants them to submit to her orders. Instead, the boys walk outside to the barn and steal milk. Mrs. Cope is concerned their cigarette smoking will start a fire since the farm has suffered a summer long drought. Night falls and the boys want to go to sleep in the barn, but Mrs. Cope insists they sleep in the field due to her fear that they will burn down the barn. The following day, the boys wake up and defy Mrs. Cope by riding her horses and letting the bull loose. Later in the afternoon, Mrs. Cope sees the boys throwing rocks at her mailbox and tells them she is going to call the police. The boys disappear, but as night falls Mrs. Cope smells smoke and sees the forest on her property is on fire. As she gets her servants, she approaches the fire and hears the boys laughter dancing in the fiery furnace of her forest. As fire engulfs the property, Mrs. Cope’s  biggest fears have been realized. Her fortress was more fragile than she thought and her control is gone.

For Mrs. Clinton, the main stream media, Wall Street, the Washington DC elites, Hollywood, academia, Democrats, and the GOP establishment; the future will no longer be the same. Many will be fired and replaced. This election, the outsider broke through the farm gates and burned the establishment down. However, there is a technique in forest management called a controlled burn which is used when a forest is lit on fire in order to save it.  Moving forward, Donald Trump has the match in his hands and has the opportunity to control burn the Washington establishment to try to save it. It should be all our hope that President Trump can manage and steward the forest we call America.   

Joseph is a senior majoring in accounting and business administration with a minor in economics.