Categories
Opinions

Indigenous Rights and the DAPL

In the brief 240 years of its existence, the United States of America has made remarkable progress toward righting many of the wrongs it has done. However, some of the most egregious and oldest among them still exist in various forms to this day. Fittingly, as I began my research for this piece “Barbed Wire” by Kendrick Lamar came on. The song talks about the struggles minorities face in overcoming obstacles to their success placed on them from birth. It was poignant to learn about the plight of the Standing Rock Sioux and other tribes protesting the route of the Dakota Access Pipeline to lines such as “even if you overcame doubt and your living ain’t bad/ Know it’s some barbed wire that’s always in your path.” The barbed wire, in this case, is a lack of concern for indigenous rights displayed by private corporations, state and federal governments.

Photo By: Nate Moore
Photo By: Nate Moore

I won’t give a lengthy introduction to the situation at Standing Rock Reservation. However, there area few things that are important to clear up.

While the current route of the Dakota Access Pipeline does not actually run through the reservation or take land from it, it does cross under the Missouri River, the main water supply for the tribe. The protests center on the possible contamination of the river if the pipe were to leak. Energy Transfer, the company behind the pipeline, has repeatedly stated that fears of a leak are “unfounded” and that pipelines are safe. Two things prove these statements false. First is the history of crude oil pipelines. Since July 2014, when the Dakota pipeline project was publicly announced, there have been at least fourteen major crude oil pipeline leaks, spewing out over four hundred thousand gallons of crude oil. Five of these leaks were from Sunoco pipelines, a close partner of Energy Transfer. Further falsifying the statements given are the company’s own actions. The pipeline was originally slated to run nearer to Bismarck, North Dakota, but was rerouted from this course largely due to concern over the close proximity to the city’s municipal water supply sources.

clairequoteThe issue at hand is not a question of whether or not pipelines can leak and harm local peoples and ecosystems; they can and have. It is a question of whether or not we as a country are willing to let private companies knowingly gamble with the health and rights of indigenous peoples. And so far, we haven’t said no. If America does not want to echo some of the worst chapters of its brief history, its citizens and government need to take a strong stand for indigenous rights, and we need to do so now.

The “WWJD” wristbands gathering dust in our sock drawers add another layer to this question of duty. One answer to that question can be seen in the 500 clergy from all over the country who recently joined tribe members to form a Niobrara Circle of Life on the site of the most recent and most violent clash. Together they sang hymns and prayed for the protesters, policemen, pipeline workers, and government officials involved in the conflict. As Christians we are called by Jesus to love and care for our fellow humans, especially those of us who are hurting and oppressed. In America, as in many countries around the world, indigenous peoples have historically been among the most oppressed members of society, and many still suffer daily from what lingers of this unfortunate reality. Our duty is to show love, empathy and respect for the rights of First Nation peoples. Even if you can’t make it to a vigil, aren’t sure you’re up to organizing a local protest, and don’t have the time to hitchhike to Standing Rock Reservation you can still take the most powerful action of all: pray for those standing on either side of the barbed wire. Pray for the protection of indigenous rights.

Claire is a junior international development major with minors in middle eastern studies and biology.

 

Categories
National News

National // Standing Rock Protests Escalate

Protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline at the Standing Rock Sioux reservation in North Dakota have shown signs of escalation. The New York Times reported that police forces attempted to move protesters out of an area in which they set up camp, and were warded off for several hours by a line of burning wood and vehicles. The New York Times also reported that a woman allegedly fired two rounds of a handgun at the authorities, though no one was hit.

The protesters were gathered on a section of land owned by Energy Transfer Partners, the private company responsible for the pipeline construction. Morton County Sheriff, Kyle Kirchmeier,  said protesters “forced our hand,” referring to his officers’ use of beanbag bullets, tear gas, and military vehicles against protesters.

Photo courtesy of Fibonacci Blue via Flikr
Photo courtesy of Fibonacci Blue via Flikr

Amnesty International sent individuals to observe police actions, according to the New York Times. Protesters see the pipeline as a significant cultural and environmental threat, the New York Times also reported. TIME stated that even a small oil leakage, if it were to occur near the Missouri River, could be detrimental for anyone living along the waterway, even as far south as the Gulf of Mexico.

The Standing Rock Sioux tribe is suing the Army Corps of Engineers, on the grounds that the agency allegedly violated the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The NHPA requires Corps to consider the cultural significance of federally-permitted sites and NEPA requires it to take the preservation of waterways into account, according to TIME. Aside from the environmental concerns, tribal leaders also say that sacred lands, including burial grounds, would be desecrated by the pipeline’s construction, the New York Times reported.

“We have repeatedly seen a disproportionate response from law enforcement to water protectors’ nonviolent exercise of their constitutional rights,” Dave Archambault II, the chairman of the Standing Rock Sioux tribe told the New York Times. “We need our state and federal governments to bring justice and peace to our lands, not the force of armored vehicles,” he said.

A WhiteHouse.gov petition calling on President Obama to halt construction reached 312,476 signatures on September 14. Obama ordered construction to temporarily cease, but a federal court overturned this order. Democratic presidential candidate, Hillary Clinton, has not taken a firm stance on the matter, though TIME reported she urged both Energy Transfer Partners and the Standing Rock Sioux tribe to “find a path forward that serves the broadest public interest.” Republican candidate, Donald Trump, reportedly owns stock in Energy Transfer Partners, and while he has said the oil and gas industry should not be regulated, he has not commented specifically on the pipeline protests.

On social media, celebrities such as Mark Ruffalo and Al Gore have expressed their support for protesters at Standing Rock. Over 100,000 people used the Facebook “Check-In” feature to locate themselves at Standing Rock, according to TIME. This mass “Check-In” followed a rumor that local police forces were using the feature to track protesters on the ground, and individuals not at Standing Rock were encouraged to check in to the protest sight to overwhelm the police. However, the Morton County Police Department stated on Twitter that this rumor was false, and the department does not follow Facebook check-ins at the protest sight nor any other locations.