Categories
Opinions

Ambiguity and Confusion in the Imitation of God

As a kid, my parents bravely took me on a trip to the geysers at Yellowstone National Park. This was daring because they were taking me out on a wooden walkway, surrounded by boiling water mixed with sulfur. I remember being terrified that the wooden structure would break, and my entire family would plummet to our boiling doom. I thought it much better to remain on the dry land, away from the scary wooden walkway, where nothing bad could possibly happen.

Courtesy of travel.nationalgeographic.com
Courtesy of travel.nationalgeographic.com

My mother would have none of this. She had dragged two squawling toddlers across the continent, and had no intention of remaining on the boring, dry land when she could be walking six inches above a boiling geyser. As I loudly denounced her, she dragged me by my skinny wrist out to the observation platform. Every time I tried to bolt, she would bring me back, until it finally dawned on me that the wooden walkway was not in fact going to plunge us into Nature’s cauldron.

As a senior in high school, I was pulled aside by a well-meaning, but very conservative, friend. He was afraid that “those professors” with their theories would undermine my pure, simple, uncritical faith. He was afraid I would wander off the walkway of faith, and boil to death in the sulfurous world of academics. Little did he know how correct he would prove to be.

At Houghton, I have learned to doubt. I have learned to doubt simple answers, quick replies and the reduction of life to the formulaic. There are very few parts of my pre-college life that I haven’t learned to doubt. Morality? Check. Faith? Check. Political affiliation? Check. Social views? Check. Star Wars vs. Star Trek? Check. The list goes on and on, until at last I realize that I have, at some point or another throughout my college years, held every single opinion on almost every issue Out There in the world. I have waffled between the isms like a sail in a crosswind.

I also doubt whether this is a bad thing.

There must be a space for ambiguity in this world. Back on that wooden walkway in Yellowstone, I was convinced we were about to topple into the geyser. My four year old brain knew nothing about structural integrity or about the fact that wood floats on water. I didn’t know that the government sent out inspectors to make sure that no one plunged to their doom in the geyser. The entire regulatory and building structure of modern society was almost entirely unknown to me. I hadn’t learned to trust the world.

Nor would I have learned about the trustworthiness of modern carpentry if I hadn’t eventually wandered out onto that wooden walkway. The only way to learn to trust is to nearly fall into boiling water. I could hardly have known, later in life, that airport terminal arms, skyscrapers, bridges, or the infamous road climbing into the Dalmatian hillside called “The Stairway to Heaven” were reliable if I hadn’t learned to trust that walkway.

Similarly, I could hardly learn to trust modern society and its multitude of intellectual, spiritual and moral developments without going through a period of complete bewilderment and ambiguity. As human beings, we can’t learn without experiencing confusion, and we can’t love without feeling pain. Houghton’s official religion, Christianity, contains this belief at its core.  God entered the particularity and confusion of human existence, and felt pain, in order that we might understand love.

Here’s to ambiguity and confusion in imitation of God. Here’s to inching out slowly, ever so slowly, onto the wooden walkway. Here’s to continuing to study and analyze and synthesize. May you never wander off the walkway, but please don’t remain back on the land looking anxious. If I try to bolt to the land, make sure I don’t succeed, and when you try to bolt I’ll drag you back to the observation deck. The confusion and the uncertainty is good, and ambiguity is actually healthy, for this is the only way to learn to love. May God protect us all from the denial of confusion, and the elimination of ambiguity.

 

Categories
News

Cardinal Bergoglio Made Pope Francis I

Habemus Papam: we have a Pope, the cardinals announced via white smoke pouring from the chimney of the Sistine Chapel.  The world’s 1.2 billion Catholics, and the population of the world at large, waited expectantly for the new Roman Pontiff to appear on the balcony of St. Peter’s.

Courtesy of guardian.co.uk
Courtesy of guardian.co.uk

Few observers in the days leading up to the Conclave were talking about Jorge Bergoglio.  There were other, more popular candidates, including the cardinals from Nigeria, Brazil, the Philippines, the United States and, of course, Italy.  The quiet, humble Argentinean archbishop was considered to have reached his zenith and begun to fade.

And yet there he stood on Wednesday, taking the name Francis I.  This name was perhaps as surprising as the choice of Bergoglio, since no pope has ever taken the name Francis.  The most famous Christian by the name was Francis of Assisi, and for various reasons no pope has wanted to be compared with Francis of Assisi until today.

Commentators are still wondering what this means for the direction of the Catholic Church.  Bergoglio is famous in Argentina for riding public transportation instead of an episcopal limousine.  He also decided to settle in a small apartment and cook his own meals, instead of living in the massive arch-episcopal palace and hiring staff.

When Francis was Provincial of the Jesuit Order in Argentina, he redirected Jesuit clergy away from liberation-theology-style political involvement and into parish work.  Nevertheless, he is also widely lauded for his efforts in social justice and poverty relief.  He is considered theologically conservative, especially on issues such as gay marriage and abortion.

Francis I is the first non-European pope since 741 and the first ever from the Western Hemisphere.  He is the son of an Italian railway worker, making him of European descent but raised in Argentina.  Approximately 40% of the world’s Catholics live in Latin America.

Francis takes over the Papacy at a time of deep uncertainty in the Catholic Church.  The English-speaking Catholic world has been rocked by multiple child sex abuse scandals in Scotland, Ireland and the United States.  The European Catholic Church is facing declining membership, while the church in the Global South is rapidly expanding.

There are also internal Vatican issues he will have to face as a relative outsider to the Roman Curia.  In the past few years, the Papal Butler has been on trial for leaking Vatican secrets.  A subsequent Vatican investigation uncovered an alleged blackmailing scheme involving possibly homosexual cardinals and factional infighting within the Vatican.  Pope Benedict is also supposed to have decided to retire upon reading the report of this investigation.

Pope Benedict XVI, whose retirement prompted the conclave that elected Francis I, appointed Ernst von Freyberg to lead the Vatican Bank on the day of his retirement.  The Vatican Bank has been under scrutiny by the EU since it uses the Euro but is habitually secretive.  There have been allegations of financial impropriety and bribery under Benedict’s leadership.

The new pope will be formally installed in St. Peter’s Basilica on March 19.