Categories
Opinions

Seeking Sensible Solutions

When I look at the world around me, I am reminded of the social and political debates that consume America. Each time one of these topics is discussed—whether it be the unfair treatment of minorities, gender roles, or abortion rates—it seems that people are forced to take a binary stance on that topic. They must say either “Yes, that is a problem,” or “No, it isn’t an issue.” However, this dichotomy harms our ability to see nuance and divides Americans along political party lines. Disagreements like these, where one party is fully on board and the other is almost entirely antagonistic to the cause, can turn people against each other faster than any other situation I know.

Examples of this polarization include our reactions to the conditions of majority black neighborhoods, the amount of gun violence in the United States, and the number of abortions per year in the United States. These are all things which the average person should say “yes, that is a problem.” Then why is it that, when engaging in discussion or disagreement, there is usually one individual who claims that the problem is entirely nonexistent? Hardly ever do we agree on one real problem and discuss solutions.

Our leaders do the same thing and it’s almost like we are imitating them, like little kids pretend to be their parents. Whenever one side presents an issue, the other side makes it their responsibility to dismiss the concerns raised. Even if it is something that is conservative and cultural in nature, if the Democrats bring it up, it is always wrong to a Republican. Even if a cause fundamentally pushes for the rights of humankind, if it is brought up by a conservative, the liberal population will tear it apart. Strictly liberal or conservative solutions to problems don’t exist, and we need to stop pretending that they do. If we are going to function under our bipartisan system, we should focus on appropriate solutions, not on what problems deserve to be considered problems. America would look at a lot more hopeful if people like Bernie Sanders or Paul Ryan didn’t go on Twitter and immediately start tearing apart the other side. For instance, when the government shut down last week, both Democrats and Republicans took to social media to blame the other side rather than actually attempting to work things out.

Our culture’s major problems need to be defined broadly, because what we might consider an appropriate solution to a problem is often influenced by what we perceive as the root cause. For instance, “liberal” and “conservative” solutions to America’s gun violence issue stem from different understandings of this issue’s cause. For more liberal individuals, the solution is stricter gun laws because the left’s view of the problem is related to individuals’ ability to obtain guns. On the other hand, the right’s solution to the problem involves greater emphasis on mental health concerns because to most conservative individuals, that is the primary cause of mass shootings.

When engaging in political or social discussion, which is healthy and important, it is vital that we strive to define our terms and seriously consider others’ perspectives. This means looking at the concerns of people who we disagree with politically rather than dismissing their priorities out of hand. It is much more likely that we will have a productive conversation when we focus on solutions rather than problems. Only then can the appropriate path for change be revealed. Though no problems will directly be solved by doing this, we will view those we are debating more seriously, their concerns will be easier to understand, and working towards solving a problem will be much more civilized.

Devin is a sophomore majoring in English and writing.

Categories
Opinions

Comments and Commitments

The fall semester is underway, sports teams are hitting their stride, classes are increasing in difficulty and workload, and a whole new batch of freshmen are destined to start dating. Especially at Houghton, freshman dating season is a dangerous time, both to the incoming freshmen and to the rest of us who have to witness relationship after relationship fail. I remember when I arrived my freshman year people told me, “Don’t date freshman year, it won’t last through the next two semesters.” As I watched a flood of couples get into relationships that inevitably ended in ashes, that advice seemed to hold true for many cases. However, I started dating freshman year and I am currently still in that relationship.

Based off this personal experience, I can’t tell first-year students not to date, because in doing so I would be a hypocrite. There are ways to make freshman relationships work. It takes a special kind of individual to engage in a relationship during their freshman year, and there is a level of understanding and commitment required for two individuals who start dating freshman year to work out.

Maturity is the key to making things work and being respectful to others. The maturity that prepares some freshmen to create relationships that can last is built on experiences. It takes communication, thoughtfulness, respect, and space in order to make sure that a new relationship is healthy for the couple involved and those around them.  

At a Christian college, it can be easy to think that being surrounded by Christians means that God’s match for you must be on campus. This is false for the most part, as many who start dating freshman year come to realize. However, contrary to common non-freshman belief, it is not an absolute falsehood. To sophomores, juniors, and seniors, the prospect of anyone dating during their first year is abominable. We are blind to the possibility that some first-year students are mature enough to start dating when they get here.

It is true that on average, most freshman couples will break up by the end of their first year, but there are plenty of non-freshman couples who break up in the same amount of time. I think it is our own superiority complex that causes us to look down on freshman couples. We have a tendency to make fun of the new kids regardless of what they do. To an extent, it seems that freshmen have to earn the love and acceptance of upperclassmen. Only then can they start dating without their relationship being judged as doomed to fail.

I do think that as a general rule, freshmen should shy away from dating right away. Dating is a time commitment, one that is a huge undertaking especially during the first year of college. However, upperclassmen should not feel entitled to judge freshmen for dating. The truth is that we don’t know who will be right for each other. Someone being a first-year does not necessarily mean that they are less mature than upperclassmen a few years older than them.

Devin is a sophomore double majoring in English and writing.

Categories
Stories In Focus

First Issue of Lanthorn Continues Legacy

On Friday, October 28, Houghton College’s poetry and prose periodical, The Lanthorn, put out its first issue of the academic year. Edited by Carina Martin ‘18 and illustrated by Natalia Sytch ‘18, the subject of this first edition was “On Bodies.” Martin asked writers to describe, deconstruct, and transform the human perception of bodies, writing in the preface to the issue: “A body is a difficult thing to be.” The editor’s note concluded with the statement, “The silent threshold awaits. The place just past it coaxes us to jump–or tiptoe quietly–or leap with our breath tight inside our chests. Let’s meet there.”

According to Martin, “The Lanthorn has been a Houghton literary tradition for decades. We have issues dating back as far as the early 1930s.” She added, “[The magazine] is about students who love words coming together to encourage each other creatively and ponder each other’s perspectives.” It is a collaborative form of expression that “exists so that we can all come together in fellowship around the written word. In a world of constant division, the goal of The Lanthorn is to unite and inform us rather than divide us.”

While Martin is the editor of the publication, The Lanthorn is a collaborative effort of many students on Houghton’s campus. All students are invited to submit their work via a campus-wide email, and once all of the submissions have been received, Martin sends them out to her readers. These readers are not given the names of writers, and are asked to rate the pieces they receive. Martin then compiles the top-rated pieces, lays out the issue using Adobe InDesign, and prints it through Quick Print.

The literary magazine has been a continued presence on Houghton’s campus since its first issue was published in 1932. Sophia Ross ‘17, whose grandfather, Wesley Nussey ’40, was one of the first editors of The Lanthorn in 1938, and acted as one of two co-editors her junior year, recognizes the legacy of the magazine. When asked what sets it apart from other writing outlets at Houghton, Ross stated that the periodical is “an outlet where we can voice how we feel.” Where other publications are more focused on current events and technology, The Lanthorn is “geared toward the poetic,” she said.

“I think it affirms poetry’s continued significance in today’s society,” Ross said. She believes each issue is a continuation of the larger canon of The Lanthorn, adding that topics explored in past issues of the publication dating back to the mid-1900s explore similar themes to the work published in today’s Lanthorn.    

According to Martin, what separates this most recent issue from previous issues is that it is rooted in diversity. Martin stated there is a “a higher degree of diversity than there has been in the past.” She added, “There are a lot of people at Houghton who are writing, powerful, insightful, beautiful words.” In publishing their work, she hopes to “shine a light on some of the voices we may not hear from very often.”

Joe Miner ‘18, who was published for the first time in this edition, described this edition as “more confessional” than previous issues. He said, “Every piece goes deep to the core of the writer.” Along with Martin and Miner, this issue’s writers are comprised of students from several different years and majors, including Theresa Patnala ‘19, Samuel Yuly ‘18, Meredith Guffey ‘17, Judith Marklin ‘17, Rachel Harrington ‘19, Hendrick de Smidt ‘19, Bethany Kuiken ‘18, Jonan Pilet ‘17, and Shannon Moore ‘19. Each voice views the human body and its struggles and celebrations differently, which in turn represents what Martin described as the “incredible diverse interests and passions” of Houghton students.